From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>,
Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
dwg@au1.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [PowerPC Book3E] Introduce new ptrace debug feature flag
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:04:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111222093447.GD26407@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111221005502.GE5188@truffala.fritz.box>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:55:02AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 04:53:30PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > While PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG ptrace flag in PowerPC accepts
> > PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT mode of breakpoint, the same is not intimated to the
> > user-space debuggers (like GDB) who may want to use it. Hence we introduce a
> > new PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_EXACT flag which will be populated on the
> > "features" member of "struct ppc_debug_info" to advertise support for the
> > same on Book3E PowerPC processors.
>
> Hrm. I had assumed the reason there wasn't a feature bit for EXACT
> originally was that EXACT breakpoints were *always* supposed to be
> supported by the new interface.
>
Okay. Although BookS doesn't support EXACT breakpoints, it is possible
(after the introduction of new hw-breakpoint interfaces) to request for
a breakpoint of length 1 Byte.
The hw-breakpoint infrastructure would take care of filtering the
extraneous interrupts arising out of accesses in the neighbourhood, in
such a case.
David,
Can you Ack this patch too, if you find the changes acceptable?
Thanks,
K.Prasad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-22 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-08 11:12 [PATCH 0/2] Changes to PowerPC ptrace flags using watchpoints - v2 K.Prasad
2011-12-08 11:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags K.Prasad
2011-12-21 0:54 ` David Gibson
2011-12-08 11:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] [PowerPC Book3E] Introduce new ptrace debug feature flag K.Prasad
2011-12-21 0:55 ` David Gibson
2011-12-22 9:34 ` K.Prasad [this message]
2012-01-16 8:18 ` David Gibson
2012-02-15 22:18 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-19 7:45 [PATCH 0/2] Changes to PowerPC ptrace flags using watchpoints K.Prasad
2011-08-19 7:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] [PowerPC Book3E] Introduce new ptrace debug feature flag K.Prasad
2011-08-23 5:09 ` David Gibson
2011-08-23 9:27 ` K.Prasad
2011-08-24 4:00 ` David Gibson
2011-08-25 0:41 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-08-26 4:41 ` David Gibson
2011-08-31 0:27 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2011-09-19 1:10 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111222093447.GD26407@in.ibm.com \
--to=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
--cc=dwg@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).