From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gx0-f179.google.com (mail-gx0-f179.google.com [209.85.161.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37039B6FCC for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:20:40 +1100 (EST) Received: by ggnf2 with SMTP id f2so1448997ggn.38 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:20:37 -0800 (PST) Sender: Grant Likely Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:20:34 -0700 From: Grant Likely To: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [RFC 13/14] irq_domain: Remove 'new' irq_domain in favour of the ppc one Message-ID: <20120113022034.GA25999@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <1326313337-24603-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <1326313337-24603-14-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <4F0DFC0F.2090005@gmail.com> <4F0F7B60.5040701@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4F0F7B60.5040701@gmail.com> Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:31:28PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Adding lakml... > > On 01/11/2012 03:27 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > >> Grant, > >> > >> On 01/11/2012 02:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > >>> This patch removes the simplistic implementation of irq_domains and enables > >>> the powerpc infrastructure for all irq_domain users. The powerpc > >>> infrastructure includes support for complex mappings between Linux and > >>> hardware irq numbers, and can manage allocation of irq_descs. > >>> > >>> This patch also converts the few users of irq_domain_add()/irq_domain_del() > >>> to call irq_domain_add_legacy() instead. > >> > >> So what is the non-legacy way? Legacy implies we don't want to do it > >> that way. I guess until we remove all non-DT platforms with GIC we are > >> stuck with legacy. That seems like it could be a ways out until we get > >> there. > > > > Non-legacy is letting the irq_domain manage the irq_desc allocations. > > Some of the controllers will be easy to convert, some will be more > > difficult. The primary thing that really blocks getting away from the > > legacy method is anything that expects hardcoded #defined irq numbers. > > The goal is to convert all users over to the linear revmap method. > > > > So I gave this a spin on highbank. I ran into a couple problems. > > I had to revert "irqdesc: Consolidate irq reservation logic" which is in > your branch, but not this series. irq_alloc_desc_from was returning -EEXIST. Gah, I flubbed that patch too. Try this on top of it: --- diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c index 8a9e2ec..11feb2f 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c @@ -375,6 +375,9 @@ __irq_reserve_irqs(int irq, unsigned int from, unsigned int cnt) } bitmap_set(allocated_irqs, start, cnt); + mutex_unlock(&sparse_irq_lock); + return start; + err: mutex_unlock(&sparse_irq_lock); return ret; @@ -408,7 +411,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__irq_alloc_descs); */ int irq_reserve_irqs(unsigned int from, unsigned int cnt) { - return __irq_reserve_irqs(from, from, cnt); + int start = __irq_reserve_irqs(from, from, cnt); + return start < 0 ? start : 0; } /**