From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:02:19 +1100 From: Paul Mackerras To: Alexander Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: Move gfn_to_memslot() to kvm_host.h Message-ID: <20120117050219.GA9170@drongo> References: <20111220092102.GA5626@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20120112104115.GA32021@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20120113060951.GB15875@drongo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Avi Kivity , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:30:41PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > Which tree is this against? I got this diff between your patch and the patch when applied on my tree: It's against your tree (previously) plus my first 13-patch series, but not the second series of 5 patches, which presumably why you got the difference. Sounds like you got it applied OK; if not let me know and I'll rebase against your current tree. Paul.