From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from linux-sh.org (linux-sh.org [111.68.239.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2205FB6F98 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:29:42 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:42:21 +0900 From: Paul Mundt To: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PULL] ARM mach/irqs.h cleanup for 3.4 Message-ID: <20120201054221.GA3531@linux-sh.org> References: <4F284532.90303@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4F284532.90303@gmail.com> Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot , Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , jamie@jamieiles.com, Robert Jarzmik , Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Haojian Zhuang , Marek Vasut , Ingo Molnar , Mark Salter , Arnd Bergmann , Nobuhiro Iwamatsu , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Eric Miao , Nicolas Pitre , Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:46:58PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Can you please pull mach/irqs.h clean-up for 3.4. I've gotten little to > no response from the affected platform maintainers. It's primarily > superh and shmobile that have any significant changes though. > Sorry about that, it's been in my backlog. The changes as they are are fine with me, I've got some pending work that switches to dynamic use off of nr_irqs that will make most of it redundant that I had hoped to have done in time, but it can be done incrementally at a later point in time, too.