From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com (mail-ob0-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31631B6EE6 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:08:01 +1000 (EST) Received: by obbuo19 with SMTP id uo19so7504437obb.38 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:06:41 -0700 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov Subject: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fixes for common mistakes w/ for_each_process and task->mm Message-ID: <20120423070641.GA27702@lizard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Mike Frysinger , Peter Zijlstra , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger , patches@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mundt , John Stultz , KOSAKI Motohiro , Russell King , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi all, This is another resend of several task->mm fixes, the bugs I found during LMK code audit. Architectures were traverse the tasklist in an unsafe manner, plus there are a few cases of unsafe access to task->mm in general. There were no objections on the previous resend, and the final words were somewhere along "the patches are fine" line. In v3: - Dropped a controversal 'Make find_lock_task_mm() sparse-aware' patch; - Reword arm and sh commit messages, per Oleg Nesterov's suggestions; - Added an optimization trick in clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(): take only the rcu read lock, no need for the whole tasklist_lock. Suggested by Peter Zijlstra. In v2: - introduced a small helper in cpu.c: most arches duplicate the same [buggy] code snippet, so it's better to fix it and move the logic into a common function. Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov Email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com