linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next ppc64: RCU mods cause __might_sleep BUGs
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:14:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120430231433.GO2429@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1204301451270.2986@eggly.anvils>

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:37:10PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> On 3.4.0-rc4-next-20120427 and preceding linux-nexts (I've not tried
> rc5-next-20120430 but expect it's the same), on PowerPC G5 quad with
> CONFIG_PREEMPT=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y, I'm getting spurious
> "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context" messages from
> __might_sleep().
> 
> Just once I saw such a message during startup.  Once I saw such a
> message when rebuilding the machine's kernel.  Usually I see them
> when I'm running a swapping load of kernel builds under memory
> pressure (but that's what I'm habitually running there): perhaps
> after a few minutes a flurry comes, then goes away, comes back
> again later, and after perhaps a couple of hours of that I see
> "INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls" messages too, and soon it
> freezes (or perhaps it's still running, but I'm so flooded by
> messages that I reboot anyway).
> 
> Rather like from before you fixed schedule_tail() for your per-cpu
> RCU mods, but not so easy to reproduce.  I did a bisection and indeed
> it converged as expected on the RCU changes.  No such problem seen on
> x86: it looks as if there's some further tweak required on PowerPC.
> 
> Here are my RCU config options (I don't usually have the TORTURE_TEST
> in, but tried that for half an hour this morning, in the hope that it
> would generate the issue: but it did not).
> 
> # RCU Subsystem
> CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU=y
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
> CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=64
> # CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT is not set
> CONFIG_TREE_RCU_TRACE=y
> # CONFIG_RCU_BOOST is not set
> CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE=y
> # CONFIG_SPARSE_RCU_POINTER is not set
> CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=m
> CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT=60
> # CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_VERBOSE is not set
> # CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO is not set
> CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=y
> 
> Here's the message when I was rebuilding the G5's kernel:
> 
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/pagemap.h:354
> in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 6886, name: cc1
> Call Trace:
> [c0000001a99f78e0] [c00000000000f34c] .show_stack+0x6c/0x16c (unreliable)
> [c0000001a99f7990] [c000000000077b40] .__might_sleep+0x11c/0x134
> [c0000001a99f7a10] [c0000000000c6228] .filemap_fault+0x1fc/0x494
> [c0000001a99f7af0] [c0000000000e7c9c] .__do_fault+0x120/0x684
> [c0000001a99f7c00] [c000000000025790] .do_page_fault+0x458/0x664
> [c0000001a99f7e30] [c000000000005868] handle_page_fault+0x10/0x30
> 
> I've plenty more examples, most of them from page faults or from kswapd;
> but I don't think there's any more useful information in them.
> 
> Anything I can try later on?

Interesting...  As you say, I saw this sort of thing before applying
the changes to schedule_tail(), and it is all too possible that there
is some other "sneak path" for context switches.

Have you tried running with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU?  This enables some
additional debugging in rcu_switch_from() and rcu_switch_to() that
helped track down the schedule_tail() problem.

						Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-30 23:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-30 22:37 linux-next ppc64: RCU mods cause __might_sleep BUGs Hugh Dickins
2012-04-30 23:14 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-05-01  0:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-05-01  5:10   ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-01 14:22     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-01 21:42       ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-01 23:25         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 20:25           ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-02 20:49             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 21:32               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 21:36                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 21:20             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-05-02 21:54               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 22:54                 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-03  0:14                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-03  0:24                     ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-07 16:21                       ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-07 18:50                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-07 21:38                           ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-01 13:39   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120430231433.GO2429@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).