From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/time: Sanity check of decrementer expiration is necessary
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:31:04 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120604123104.20951358@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120601100102.GA11714@pale.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Hi Paul,
> This reverts 68568add2c ("powerpc/time: Remove unnecessary sanity
> check of decrementer expiration"). We do need to check whether we
> have reached the expiration time of the next event, because we
> sometimes get an early decrementer interrupt, most notably when we
> set the decrementer to 1 in arch_irq_work_raise(). The effect of not
> having the sanity check is that if timer_interrupt() gets called
> early, we leave the decrementer set to its maximum value, which means
> we then don't get any more decrementer interrupts for about 4 seconds
> (or longer, depending on timebase frequency). I saw these pauses as
> a consequence of getting a stray hypervisor decrementer interrupt
> left over from exiting a KVM guest.
Urgh, sorry for that mess.
Acked-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Anton
> This isn't quite a straight revert because of changes to the
> surrounding code, but it restores the same algorithm as was
> previously used.
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> ---
> If there are no objections, I'll send this to Linus shortly. This
> regression is present in 3.3 and 3.4 as well as current upstream.
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> index 99a995c..be171ee 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> @@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ void timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs * regs)
> struct pt_regs *old_regs;
> u64 *next_tb = &__get_cpu_var(decrementers_next_tb);
> struct clock_event_device *evt =
> &__get_cpu_var(decrementers);
> + u64 now;
>
> /* Ensure a positive value is written to the decrementer, or
> else
> * some CPUs will continue to take decrementer exceptions.
> @@ -509,9 +510,16 @@ void timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs * regs)
> irq_work_run();
> }
>
> - *next_tb = ~(u64)0;
> - if (evt->event_handler)
> - evt->event_handler(evt);
> + now = get_tb_or_rtc();
> + if (now >= *next_tb) {
> + *next_tb = ~(u64)0;
> + if (evt->event_handler)
> + evt->event_handler(evt);
> + } else {
> + now = *next_tb - now;
> + if (now <= DECREMENTER_MAX)
> + set_dec((int)now);
> + }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> /* collect purr register values often, for accurate
> calculations */
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-04 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-01 10:01 [PATCH] powerpc/time: Sanity check of decrementer expiration is necessary Paul Mackerras
2012-06-04 2:31 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120604123104.20951358@kryten \
--to=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).