From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sshtylyov@mvista.com,
david.daney@cavium.com, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/10] POWERPC: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock()/ipi_call_unlock()
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:05:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120618170554.GE2400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120618025159.GA24420@zhy>
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:51:59AM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 09:32:19AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 03:16:04PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > > From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@windriver.com>
> > >
> > > 1) call_function.lock used in smp_call_function_many() is just to protect
> > > call_function.queue and &data->refs, cpu_online_mask is outside of the
> > > lock. And it's not necessary to protect cpu_online_mask,
> > > because data->cpumask is pre-calculate and even if a cpu is brougt up
> > > when calling arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(), it's harmless because
> > > validation test in generic_smp_call_function_interrupt() will take care
> > > of it.
> > >
> > > 2) For cpu down issue, stop_machine() will guarantee that no concurrent
> > > smp_call_fuction() is processing.
> >
> > However, there is an effort to get rid of stop_machine() from the
> > CPU-down path... So something else will be needed.
>
> Yeah. So Thomas changed the commit log like below:
> [
> ipi_call_lock/unlock() lock resp. unlock call_function.lock. This lock
> protects only the call_function data structure itself, but it's
> completely unrelated to cpu_online_mask. The mask to which the IPIs
> are sent is calculated before call_function.lock is taken in
> smp_call_function_many(), so the locking around set_cpu_online() is
> pointless and can be removed.
>
> [ tglx: Massaged changelog ]
> ]
>
> in tip/smp/hotplug.
Got it, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks,
> Yong
>
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> > > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > > ---
> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 --
> > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> > > index e4cb343..e1417c4 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> > > @@ -571,7 +571,6 @@ void __devinit start_secondary(void *unused)
> > > if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> > > vdso_data->processorCount++;
> > > #endif
> > > - ipi_call_lock();
> > > notify_cpu_starting(cpu);
> > > set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
> > > /* Update sibling maps */
> > > @@ -601,7 +600,6 @@ void __devinit start_secondary(void *unused)
> > > of_node_put(np);
> > > }
> > > of_node_put(l2_cache);
> > > - ipi_call_unlock();
> > >
> > > local_irq_enable();
> > >
> > > --
> > > 1.7.5.4
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> --
> Only stand for myself
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-18 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1338275765-3217-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
2012-05-29 7:16 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] POWERPC: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock()/ipi_call_unlock() Yong Zhang
2012-06-16 16:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 17:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-16 20:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-18 2:51 ` Yong Zhang
2012-06-18 17:05 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120618170554.GE2400@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).