From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/perf: Move code to select SIAR or pt_regs into perf_read_regs
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:01:36 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120626210136.4f616e0e@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120626210013.2fbb9044@kryten>
The logic to choose whether to use the SIAR or get the information
out of pt_regs is going to get more complicated, so do it once in
perf_read_regs.
We overload regs->result which is gross but we are already doing it
with regs->dsisr.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
---
Other architectures appear to be playing similar overloading tricks
so we should probably solve this in a nicer way.
Index: linux-build/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
===================================================================
--- linux-build.orig/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h 2012-06-26 10:26:40.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-build/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h 2012-06-26 10:31:02.132149613 +1000
@@ -26,8 +26,13 @@
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/reg.h>
+/*
+ * Overload regs->result to specify whether we should use the MSR (result
+ * is zero) or the SIAR (result is non zero).
+ */
#define perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs(regs, __ip) \
do { \
+ (regs)->result = 0; \
(regs)->nip = __ip; \
(regs)->gpr[1] = *(unsigned long *)__get_SP(); \
asm volatile("mfmsr %0" : "=r" ((regs)->msr)); \
Index: linux-build/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
===================================================================
--- linux-build.orig/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c 2012-06-26 10:28:53.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-build/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c 2012-06-26 10:35:40.560886839 +1000
@@ -73,7 +73,10 @@ static inline u32 perf_get_misc_flags(st
{
return 0;
}
-static inline void perf_read_regs(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
+static inline void perf_read_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ regs->result = 0;
+}
static inline int perf_intr_is_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
return 0;
@@ -148,17 +151,9 @@ static inline u32 perf_flags_from_msr(st
static inline u32 perf_get_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long mmcra = regs->dsisr;
+ unsigned long use_siar = regs->result;
- /* Not a PMU interrupt: Make up flags from regs->msr */
- if (TRAP(regs) != 0xf00)
- return perf_flags_from_msr(regs);
-
- /*
- * If we don't support continuous sampling and this
- * is not a marked event, same deal
- */
- if ((ppmu->flags & PPMU_NO_CONT_SAMPLING) &&
- !(mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE))
+ if (!use_siar)
return perf_flags_from_msr(regs);
/*
@@ -185,10 +180,24 @@ static inline u32 perf_get_misc_flags(st
/*
* Overload regs->dsisr to store MMCRA so we only need to read it once
* on each interrupt.
+ * Overload regs->result to specify whether we should use the MSR (result
+ * is zero) or the SIAR (result is non zero).
*/
static inline void perf_read_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- regs->dsisr = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
+ unsigned long mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
+ int marked = mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE;
+ int use_siar;
+
+ if (TRAP(regs) != 0xf00)
+ use_siar = 0;
+ else if ((ppmu->flags & PPMU_NO_CONT_SAMPLING) && !marked)
+ use_siar = 0;
+ else
+ use_siar = 1;
+
+ regs->dsisr = mmcra;
+ regs->result = use_siar;
}
/*
@@ -1342,18 +1351,12 @@ unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_
*/
unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- unsigned long mmcra = regs->dsisr;
+ unsigned long use_siar = regs->result;
- /* Not a PMU interrupt */
- if (TRAP(regs) != 0xf00)
- return regs->nip;
-
- /* Processor doesn't support sampling non marked events */
- if ((ppmu->flags & PPMU_NO_CONT_SAMPLING) &&
- !(mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE))
+ if (use_siar)
+ return mfspr(SPRN_SIAR) + perf_ip_adjust(regs);
+ else
return regs->nip;
-
- return mfspr(SPRN_SIAR) + perf_ip_adjust(regs);
}
static bool pmc_overflow(unsigned long val)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-26 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-26 11:00 [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/perf: Create mmcra_sihv/mmcra_sipv helpers Anton Blanchard
2012-06-26 11:01 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2012-06-26 11:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] powerpc/perf: Always use pt_regs for userspace samples Anton Blanchard
2012-06-26 11:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/perf: Use perf_instruction_pointer in callchains Anton Blanchard
2012-06-26 23:04 ` Scott Wood
2012-06-27 3:59 ` Anton Blanchard
2012-06-27 15:03 ` Scott Wood
2012-07-09 4:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/perf: Create mmcra_sihv/mmcra_sipv helpers Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120626210136.4f616e0e@kryten \
--to=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).