From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from linux-sh.org (linux-sh.org [111.68.239.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB8DDB6FA7 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:13:06 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:20:10 +0900 From: Paul Mundt To: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.5-rc4 Message-ID: <20120628082009.GC21764@linux-sh.org> References: <1340740795-19603-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux-sh list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:06:27PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: > > JFYI, when comparing v3.5-rc4 to v3.5-rc3[3], the summaries are: > > ??- build errors: +11/-219 > > 11 regressions: > + arch/sh/include/asm/fixmap.h: error: implicit declaration of > function 'BUG_ON' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 133:2 > + arch/sh/include/asm/thread_info.h: error: implicit declaration of > function 'WARN_ON' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 172:2 > + include/linux/huge_mm.h: error: implicit declaration of function > 'BUG' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 185:2 > > shmin_defconfig, se7712_defconfig, se7721_defconfig, sh-allnoconfig > I'm unable to reproduce any of these, is there some specific compiler version or warning flag configuration I'm supposed to be using? I'm building with 4.5.1 at the moment.