From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <aarcange@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3522C0096
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:30:11 +1000 (EST)
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:29:44 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] mm: make clear_huge_page cache clear only around
 the fault address
Message-ID: <20120816182944.GN11188@redhat.com>
References: <1345130154-9602-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
 <1345130154-9602-7-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
 <20120816161647.GM11188@redhat.com>
 <20120816164356.GA30106@shutemov.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20120816164356.GA30106@shutemov.name>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
 Alex Shi <alex.shu@intel.com>, Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
 Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
 linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
 Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
 sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
 Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:43:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Hm.. I think with static_key we can avoid cache overhead here. I'll try.

Could you elaborate on the static_key? Is it some sort of self
modifying code?

> Thanks, for review. Could you take a look at huge zero page patchset? ;)

I've noticed that too, nice :). I'm checking some detail on the
wrprotect fault behavior but I'll comment there.