From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8782C00D7 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 07:04:21 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:04:19 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Alexandre Bounine Subject: Re: [PATCH] rapidio: apply RX/TX enable to active switch ports only Message-Id: <20120824140419.2b3a9623.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1345559035-25879-2-git-send-email-alexandre.bounine@idt.com> References: <1345559035-25879-1-git-send-email-alexandre.bounine@idt.com> <1345559035-25879-2-git-send-email-alexandre.bounine@idt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:23:55 -0400 Alexandre Bounine wrote: > Modify RIO enumeration to apply RX/TX enable operations only to active > switch ports. This will leave inactive ports in condition consistent with > their state. It's unclear (to me) what the effects of this are. Does it fix some user-visible malfunction? Or is it just some nice-to-have thing? Or what? > This patch is applicable to kernel versions starting from v2.6.35. Is that a recommendation that such a backport be performed? If so, please provide the reasoning.