From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com (e38.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e38.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5339E2C0095 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 10:56:32 +1000 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e38.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:56:29 -0600 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D2119D8042 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:55:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q880ttB6214150 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:55:55 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q880ttPa032673 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:55:55 -0600 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:55:49 -0700 From: Nishanth Aravamudan To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/e6500: TLB miss handler with hardware tablewalk support Message-ID: <20120908005549.GA5451@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120614234101.GB17147@tyr.buserror.net> <1346992880.2385.51.camel@pasglop> <504A4C3D.3040709@freescale.com> <504A7CBC.80803@freescale.com> <1347061804.2385.58.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1347061804.2385.58.camel@pasglop> Cc: Scott Wood , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08.09.2012 [09:50:04 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > BTW. On another note, can you pickup Ananth series for larger address I think you mean Aneesh here? Just to help Scott find the thread. Thanks, Nish > space (minus the one patch that breaks the BookE build, it shouldn't > matter) and see if there's any runtime issue on BookE 64 ? (And whether > the larger address space actually works for you too, using something > like high up mmap tests) > > Cheers, > Ben. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev >