From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com (e8.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.138])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "e8.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified))
 by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EE132C0082
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 04:04:00 +1000 (EST)
Received: from /spool/local
 by e8.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only!
 Violators will be prosecuted
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> from <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
 Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:03:56 -0400
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217])
 by d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
 q8DI3sL0024586
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:03:54 -0400
Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
 by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id
 q8DI3rMe011613
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:03:54 -0300
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:03:40 -0700
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pseries: double NR_CPUS in defconfig
Message-ID: <20120913180340.GH9269@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20120912174706.GE9269@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20120913223739.48f27d7fbacca32b013777fc@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20120913180011.GG9269@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20120913180011.GG9269@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On 13.09.2012 [11:00:11 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> On 13.09.2012 [22:37:39 +1000], Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:47:07 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Anticipating growth in coming years, we should ensure we are getting
> > > a good lead on testing.
> > 
> > Most changes to pseries_defconfig are copied into ppc64_defconfig.
> > Should this one be as well?
> 
> Ah, I didn't realize that was the case, sorry. Yes, it probably does
> make sense to do this change. Should I just send a follow-on patch?

Actually, ppc64_defconfig doesn't currently define CONFIG_NR_CPUS.
NR_CPUS' powerpc Kconfig allows 2-8192 already, so given the current
state, I'm not sure any further patch is necessary?

Thanks,
Nish