From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03C852C0040 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 02:29:31 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:29:19 +0100 From: Anatolij Gustschin To: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: 52xx: nop out unsupported critical IRQs Message-ID: <20121103162919.7507401f@wker> In-Reply-To: <20121103142615.GB24952@pengutronix.de> References: <1349902593-16431-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1349947155-11540-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20121020135955.709e20a8@wker> <20121103142615.GB24952@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: John Bonesio , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 15:26:15 +0100 Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > Currently, when booting MPC52xx based platforms, we get: > > > > > > mpc52xx_irqhost_map: invalid irq: virq=16, l1=0, l2=3 > > > irq: irq-16==>hwirq-0x3 mapping failed: -22 > > > [WARNing skipped] > > > > > > The warning is wrong since the mapping itself is valid. However, there is no > > > support for that type of IRQ currently. Print a proper warning and bind the irq > > > to a no_irq chip. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > applied, thanks! > > Thanks, can we have that in 3.7. already? I hope so, a pull request including this patch is pending. Thanks, Anatolij