From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jolsa@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0542C0080
 for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 07:34:34 +1100 (EST)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:34:12 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf/POWER7: Make event translations available in
 sysfs
Message-ID: <20121119203411.GB8002@krava.brq.redhat.com>
References: <20121107191818.GA16211@us.ibm.com>
 <20121107191927.GC16211@us.ibm.com>
 <20121114102534.GA2220@krava.brq.redhat.com>
 <20121114182045.GA2240@us.ibm.com>
 <20121116125154.GB1121@krava.brq.redhat.com>
 <20121116193537.GA11800@us.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20121116193537.GA11800@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, robert.richter@amd.com,
 Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:35:37AM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Jiri Olsa [jolsa@redhat.com] wrote:
> | > 
> | > Can we remove the assumption that the event id is a generic event that
> | > has PERF_COUNT_HW_ prefix and also let the architectures pass in a "show"
> | > function ? This would allow architectures to display any arch specific
> | > events that don't yet have a generic counterpart.
> | > 
> | > IOW, can we do something like this (untested) and make PERF_EVENT_ATTR global:
> | 
> | hm, then you probably can use following:
> | 
> | http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1434233.html
> 
> For now, power events can simply be u64 - so am hoping to have something
> like this and replace the raw codes:
> 
> #define PM_CYC			0x1e
> #define PM_GCT_NOSLOT_CYC	0x100f8
> 
> EVENT_ATTR_STR() is interesting, but would require new/extra macros like
> 
> #define PM_CYC_STR		"0x1e"
> #define PM_GCT_NOSLOT_CYC_STR	"0x100f8"
> 
> I went down the path we discussed earlier - to have x86 and Power share
> the EVENT_ATTR() macros. This is making the x86 code less concise
> 
> 	EVENT_ATTR(cpu-cycles,	CPU_CYCLES)
> 
> becomes
> 
> 	EVENT_ATTR(cpu-cycles,	PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES, events_sysfs_show)
> 
> with each EVENT_ATTR() explcitly adding events_sysfs_show or needing another
> wrapper around the wrappers.
> 
> Still tweaking it, but would it be flexible to make 'struct pmu_events_attr'
> common and let architectures define the EVENT_ATTR() as needed ? Would
> duplicate some code but hopefully not a lot.

sounds good, let's see ;)

jirka