linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: sr@denx.de
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, agust@denx.de, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: fec_mpc52xx: Read MAC address from device-tree
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:50:45 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130211.135045.288377899939965231.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360403352-24237-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de>

From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Date: Sat,  9 Feb 2013 10:49:12 +0100

> Until now, the MPC5200 FEC ethernet driver relied upon the bootloader
> (U-Boot) to write the MAC address into the ethernet controller
> registers. The Linux driver should not rely on such a thing. So
> lets read the MAC address from the DT as it should be done here.
> 
> This fixes a problem with a MPC5200 board that uses the SPL U-Boot
> version without FEC initialization before Linux booting for
> boot speedup.
> 
> Additionally a status line will now be printed upon successful
> driver probing, also displaying this MAC address.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>

I don't think this is a conservative enough change.

You have to keep the MAC register reading code around, as a backup
code path in case the OF device node lacks a MAC address, also:

> +	if (!is_zero_ether_addr(mpc52xx_fec_mac_addr)) {

I really wish I would have caught this terrible module parameter
when the driver was initially submitted.

I would just get rid of this, and have a priority list of cases:

1) First, try OF node MAC address, if not present or invalid, then:

2) Read from MAC address registers, if invalid, then:

3) Log a warning message, and choose a random MAC address.

That way no matter what happens, the user will at least have a
functioning networking device.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-11 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-09  9:49 [PATCH RESEND] net: fec_mpc52xx: Read MAC address from device-tree Stefan Roese
2013-02-11 18:50 ` David Miller [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-02-09  9:48 Stefan Roese

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130211.135045.288377899939965231.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=agust@denx.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sr@denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).