* [BUG][PATCH] powerpc: fix numa distance for form0 device tree
@ 2013-03-22 15:49 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2013-03-22 15:56 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan @ 2013-03-22 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: Linux PPC dev, Michael Neuling
powerpc: fix numa distance for form0 device tree
The following commit breaks numa distance setup for old powerpc
systems that use form0 encoding in device tree.
commit 41eab6f88f24124df89e38067b3766b7bef06ddb
powerpc/numa: Use form 1 affinity to setup node distance
Device tree node /rtas/ibm,associativity-reference-points would
index into /cpus/PowerPCxxxx/ibm,associativity based on form0 or
form1 encoding detected by ibm,architecture-vec-5 property.
All modern systems use form1 and current kernel code is correct.
However, on older systems with form0 encoding, the numa distance
will get hard coded as LOCAL_DISTANCE for all nodes. This causes
task scheduling anomaly since scheduler will skip building numa
level domain (topmost domain with all cpus) if all numa distances
are same. (value of 'level' in sched_init_numa() will remain 0)
Prior to the above commit:
#define node_distance(from,to)
((from) == (to) ? LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE)
Restoring compatible behavior with this patch for old powerpc systems
with device tree where numa distance are encoded as form0.
Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
index bba87ca..6a252c4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ int __node_distance(int a, int b)
int distance = LOCAL_DISTANCE;
if (!form1_affinity)
- return distance;
+ return ((a == b) ? LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE);
for (i = 0; i < distance_ref_points_depth; i++) {
if (distance_lookup_table[a][i] == distance_lookup_table[b][i])
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUG][PATCH] powerpc: fix numa distance for form0 device tree
2013-03-22 15:49 [BUG][PATCH] powerpc: fix numa distance for form0 device tree Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
@ 2013-03-22 15:56 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan @ 2013-03-22 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: Linux PPC dev, Michael Neuling
* Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2013-03-22 21:19:35]:
[snip]
> Prior to the above commit:
> #define node_distance(from,to)
> ((from) == (to) ? LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE)
>
> Restoring compatible behavior with this patch for old powerpc systems
> with device tree where numa distance are encoded as form0.
This patch on v3.9-rc3 has been tested on multi-node POWER7 with
different device tree combinations.
numactl -H would show local distance '10' for same node and remote
distance '20' for other nodes. This ensures NUMA level sched domain
gets built and load balancing could work across such configurations.
--Vaidy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-22 15:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-22 15:49 [BUG][PATCH] powerpc: fix numa distance for form0 device tree Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2013-03-22 15:56 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).