From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:58:42 +1000 From: Michael Ellerman To: Adhemerval Zanella Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Add VDSO version of time Message-ID: <20130418055842.GA14456@concordia> References: <5148C2B3.6010408@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130405062137.GA5082@concordia> <5162CEBE.1020607@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <5162CEBE.1020607@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:05:50AM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > On 04/05/2013 03:21 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:55:31PM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> This patch implement the time syscall as vDSO. I have a glibc patch > >> to use it as IFUNC (as latest gettimeofday patch). Below the perf > >> numbers: > >> > >> Baseline PPC32: 380 nsec > >> Baseline PPC64: 352 nsec > >> vdso PPC32: 20 nsec > >> vdso PPC64: 20 nsec > >> > >> I focused on 64 bit kernel, do I need to provide a scheme for 32 bits > >> as well? > > You did provide a 32-bit implementation. I take it you haven't tested > > that though? Can you test it? > > Hi, > > I didn't build a 32 bit kernel, but I tested 32 bits binaries (that uses > the VDSO32 implantation) without any issue. Performance gains are similar. OK. Please send an updated version of the patch which a changelog describing the testing you've done, and add your Signed-off-by to the patch. cheers