From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [195.92.253.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46CA82C00D3 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:10:36 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 06:10:14 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Vasant Hegde Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the powerpc tree Message-ID: <20130501051014.GA11630@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20130501120636.0e54681b2dfb7ebe6aeb27c4@canb.auug.org.au> <5180A1AD.4060409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <5180A1AD.4060409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: Al Viro Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:31:33AM +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote: > On 05/01/2013 07:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >Hi Al, > > > >Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in > >arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c between commit fb4696c39573 > >("powerpc/rtas_flash: Fix bad memory access") from the powerpc tree and > >commits ad18a364f186 ("powerpc/rtas_flash: Free kmem upon module exit") > >and 2352ad01409d ("ppc: Clean up rtas_flash driver somewhat") from the > >vfs tree. > > > > Stephen, > > As Ben mentioned earlier, there are outstanding comments from me which > needs to be addressed by Dave, before its merged. What the hell? Your fixes *are* folded into that commit and according to Ben it passes testing; is there anything still missing?