From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [IPv6:2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F153D2C0098 for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 03:49:30 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 19:49:12 +0200 From: Anatolij Gustschin To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] serial/mpc52xx_uart: prepare for adding MPC5125 PSC UART support Message-ID: <20130524194912.078467c2@crub> In-Reply-To: <1366233702-20689-1-git-send-email-agust@denx.de> References: <1363801314-16967-3-git-send-email-matteo.facchinetti@sirius-es.it> <1366233702-20689-1-git-send-email-agust@denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Matteo Facchinetti , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Vladimir Ermakov , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:21:41 +0200 Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > From: Matteo Facchinetti > > MPC5125 PSC controller has different register layout than MPC5121. > To support MPC5125 PSC in this driver we have to provide further > psc_ops functions for SoC specific register accesses. > > Add new register access functions to the psc_ops structure and > provide MPC52xx and MPC512x specific implementation for them. > Then replace remaining direct register accesses in the driver by > appropriate psc_ops function calls. The subsequent patch can now > add MPC5125 specific set of psc_ops functions. > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Ermakov > Signed-off-by: Matteo Facchinetti > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin > --- > > Greg, with your Acked-by I can push these patches to my mpc5xxx tree. > But it is fine with me if you prefer to apply them to tty tree. ping ... Thanks, Anatolij