From: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/eeh: Don't collect PCI-CFG data on PHB
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:49:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130625234917.GA4556@shangw.(null)> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372161315.3944.201.camel@pasglop>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:55:15PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 18:00 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * When the PHB is fenced or dead, it's pointless to collect
>> + * the data from PCI config space because it should return
>> + * 0xFF's. For ER, we still retrieve the data from the PCI
>> + * config space.
>> + */
>> + if (eeh_probe_mode_dev() &&
>> + (pe->type & EEH_PE_PHB) &&
>> + (pe->state & (EEH_PE_ISOLATED | EEH_PE_PHB_DEAD)))
>> + valid_cfg_log = false;
>> +
>
>I'm still unsure about that one. EEH_PE_ISOLATED could be the result
>of a normal ER of PE#0 (which can happen for various reasons other
>than a fence) in which case the config space is available and
>interesting.
>
It's something like the followings. For ER on PE#0, we will have
PE with type of EEH_PE_BUS marked as isolated, instead of the
one with EEH_PE_PHB.
[ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB]
|
[ EEH_PE_BUS ] PE#0
|
-------------------------
| |
[ EEH_PE_BUS ] PE#1 [ EEH_PE_BUS] PE#2
>I would either not bother and collect the FF's, or make this specific
>to fence and only fence.
>
I'd like to keep it specific to fenced PHB and it's already be that :-)
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 10:00 [PATCH v2 00/6] Follow-up fixes for EEH on PowerNV Gavin Shan
2013-06-25 10:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/eeh: Don't collect PCI-CFG data on PHB Gavin Shan
2013-06-25 11:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-25 23:49 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2013-06-25 23:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-26 0:12 ` Gavin Shan
2013-06-25 11:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-25 23:50 ` Gavin Shan
2013-06-25 10:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/eeh: Check PCIe link after reset Gavin Shan
2013-06-25 11:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-25 23:54 ` Gavin Shan
2013-06-25 10:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc/powernv: Replace variables with flags Gavin Shan
2013-06-25 10:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc/eeh: Fix address catch for PowerNV Gavin Shan
2013-06-25 10:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/eeh: Refactor the output message Gavin Shan
2013-06-25 10:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/eeh: Avoid build warnings Gavin Shan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-26 1:38 [PATCH v3 00/6] Follow-up fixes for EEH on PowerNV Gavin Shan
2013-06-26 1:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/eeh: Don't collect PCI-CFG data on PHB Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='20130625234917.GA4556@shangw.(null)' \
--to=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).