From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co9ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.163.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BFBF2C01C5 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:00:33 +1000 (EST) Received: from mail195-co9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail195-co9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121BDB0012F for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CO9EHSMHS009.bigfish.com (unknown [10.236.132.250]) by mail195-co9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66679D00047 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 18:00:27 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Po Liu Subject: Re: [4/4] powerpc/85xx: Update mpc85xx_defconfig for C293PCIE Message-ID: <20130722230026.GA26621@home.buserror.net> References: <1366854857-22791-4-git-send-email-Po.Liu@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <1366854857-22791-4-git-send-email-Po.Liu@freescale.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Mingkai Hu List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:54:17AM +0800, Po Liu wrote: > From: Mingkai Hu > > Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu > > --- > Base on git://git.am.freescale.net/gitolite/mirrors/linux-2.6.git > arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig b/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig > index cf815e8..ddc33a2 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig > +++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ CONFIG_MPC85xx_MDS=y > CONFIG_MPC8536_DS=y > CONFIG_MPC85xx_DS=y > CONFIG_MPC85xx_RDB=y > +CONFIG_C293_PCIE=y > CONFIG_P1010_RDB=y > CONFIG_P1022_DS=y > CONFIG_P1022_RDK=y Also, why only mpc85xx_defconfig and mpc85xx_smp_defconfig? Just because this board isn't SMP doesn't mean it can't be supported by an SMP kernel. -Scott