linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/powernv: Pick up correct number of PEs
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:24:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130801042446.GA5540@shangw.(null)> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375262326.3743.4.camel@pasglop>

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:18:46PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 16:47 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> Usually, the property "ibm,opal-num-pes" of PHB dev-tree node
>> indicates the number of total PEs. If that property isn't existing
>> or valid, we should fall back to pick the correct number of total
>> PEs according to PHB type: IODA1 or IODA2.
>
>Is that correct ? Don't we get the total number of PEs from a config
>register on the bridge ? I didn't think the IODA architecture specified
>the total number of PE of a given implementation...
>

For now, the firmware has fixed values (1/128/256), which isn't figured
out from EEH capability register. That might be something to do later
for the f/w.

>For example, does Torrent implement 128 ?
>

I don't know what's "Torrent" :-)

>I'd rather stick to safe here, if the firmware doesn't say, just use
>one.
>
>Now some of the PHB registers are actually architected in IODA afaik, so
>we could just go look but let's not make a precedent here.
>

Ok. Thanks, Ben. Please drop this one :-)

Thanks,
Gavin

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-01  4:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-31  8:47 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/powernv: Free PHB instance upon error Gavin Shan
2013-07-31  8:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/powernv: Fetch PHB bus range from dev-tree Gavin Shan
2013-07-31  8:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/powernv: Check primary PHB through ID Gavin Shan
2013-07-31  8:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/powernv: Pick up correct number of PEs Gavin Shan
2013-07-31  9:18   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-01  4:24     ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2013-08-01  4:42       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-31  8:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/powernv: Needn't IO segment map for PHB3 Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='20130801042446.GA5540@shangw.(null)' \
    --to=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).