From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:56:54 -0500 From: Ben Myers To: Jeremy Kerr Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree Message-ID: <20130821155654.GI5262@sgi.com> References: <20130820172052.1f0d89ddf6a1a40ef70333fd@canb.auug.org.au> <20130820120702.000b044e@oracle.com> <201308202246.30869.arnd@arndb.de> <20130821010822.220f592a@oracle.com> <52145E6C.80404@ozlabs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <52145E6C.80404@ozlabs.org> Cc: cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Stephen Rothwell , Arnd Bergmann , Dwight Engen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Gao feng , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hey Dwight, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:30:04PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > > Yes, I agree. The other filesystems that take an Opt_uid as well do use > > current_user_ns() and not init_user_ns. They also do a uid_valid() > > check and fail the mount (or fallback to GLOBAL_ROOT_UID). So I think > > that would look like this: > > Looks good to me. Builds and mounts as expected. > > Acked-by: Jeremy Kerr Could you repost this patch with the right subject and a commit header? Given Jeremy's Ack I think we could proceed to pull this in. Regards, Ben