From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Work around gcc miscompilation of __pa() on 64-bit
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:03:25 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130827090325.GA30336@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130827071235.GQ3430@bubble.grove.modra.org>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 04:42:35PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 04:07:49PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > On 64-bit, __pa(&static_var) gets miscompiled by recent versions of
> > gcc as something like:
> >
> > addis 3,2,.LANCHOR1+4611686018427387904@toc@ha
> > addi 3,3,.LANCHOR1+4611686018427387904@toc@l
>
> I might argue that this isn't a miscompilation, since -mcmodel=medium
> assumes everything can be accessed within +/-2G of the toc pointer,
And there's the bug right there... the assumption that this number
that I want to compute is the address of something that can be
accessed. It isn't, and gcc shouldn't treat it as such (not unless I
do something like subsequently casting it back to a pointer and
dereferencing that).
> but it's definitely a problem since gas and/or ld don't give an
> overflow error. They would except for the fact that our ABI has a
> hole in it.
Well, that and the fact that the code in gcc that generates
instructions to compute addresses blindly uses addis; addi even when
the offset involved is way too large for that to possibly work.
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-27 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-27 6:07 [PATCH] powerpc: Work around gcc miscompilation of __pa() on 64-bit Paul Mackerras
2013-08-27 7:12 ` Alan Modra
2013-08-27 9:03 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2013-09-01 23:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-02 2:31 ` Alan Modra
2013-09-02 5:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130827090325.GA30336@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).