From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@micron.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: powerpc allmodconfig build broken due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id information available to userspace)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:50:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130910225029.GA26981@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378850569.4121.28.camel@pasglop>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:02:49AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 16:55 -0700, Asai Thambi S P wrote:
> > On 09/08/2013 5:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > powerpc allmodconfig build on the latest upstream kernel results in:
> > >
> > > ERROR: ".cpu_to_chip_id" [drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.ko] undefined!
> > >
> > > This is due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id information
> > > available to userspace).
> > > Not surprising, as cpu_to_chip_id() is not exported.
> > >
> > Apart from the above error, I have a concern on the patch, purely based on the commit message.
> > (to be honest, I am not familiar with the ppc architecture)
> >
> > Commit message of 15863ff3b has the following text.
> >
> > ******************
> > So far "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/physical_package_id"
> > was always default (-1) on ppc64 architecture.
> >
> > Now, some systems have an ibm,chip-id property in the cpu nodes in
> > the device tree. On these systems, we now use this information to
> > display physical_package_id
> > ******************
> >
> > Shouldn't the new definition of "topology_physical_package_id" apply only to those systems supporting ibm,chip-id property?
>
> There should be no negative side effect (appart from the missing
> EXPORT_SYMBOL of course). If the property is not found in the
> device-tree, the new function returns -1, so it should work fine on all
> systems.
>
Good. I submitted a patch doing just that yesterday or so.
Hope you'll accept it ;).
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-09 0:28 powerpc allmodconfig build broken due to commit 15863ff3b (powerpc: Make chip-id information available to userspace) Guenter Roeck
2013-09-09 23:55 ` Asai Thambi S P
2013-09-10 1:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-10 22:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-10 22:50 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-09-11 6:36 ` Vasant Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130910225029.GA26981@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=asamymuthupa@micron.com \
--cc=benh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).