From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (tx2ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 879CF2C007E for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:21:32 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:22:52 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Nicolin Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add monaural audio support for fsl_ssi.c Message-ID: <20131115032250.GD11014@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1384427230-979-1-git-send-email-b42378@freescale.com> <20131115030247.GC11014@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20131115025956.GA745@MrMyself> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <20131115025956.GA745@MrMyself> Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, lgirdwood@gmail.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, timur@tabi.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:59:57AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:02:49AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:07:08PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > > This series of patches need to be applied into one single tree because > > > the second patch depends on the first one. Without it, SSI would playback > > > constant noise to the right channel when playback monaural audio files on > > > i.MX6 Series board. > > > > Let me try to understand if the dependency is true. > > > > Saying I apply the DTS patch on IMX tree while Mark apply the fsl_ssi > > patch on his tree, will there be any regression on either IMX tree or > > Mark's tree? The monaural playback on imx6qdl never worked, so it's not > > a regression. If there is no regression on either tree, there is no > > dependency to maintain. > > It's fair enough to understand in this way. It looks like I misunderstood > the dependency here. > > Do I need to resend them separately? No, I will just pick up the DTS patch with some testing. Shawn