From: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/eeh: Dump PHB3 diag-data on frozen PE
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:09:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131120100927.GA2546@shangw.(null)> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384940328.26969.88.camel@pasglop>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:38:48PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 17:36 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> While we detect frozen PE on PHB3, it's always meaningful to have
>> the dumped diag-data for further diagnosis and analysis.
>
>Don't we trip that during PCI probing ? For example if we probe behind
>a PCI-X bridge (which can exist on an adapter) we'll trip EEH on every
>non-existing device won't we ?
>
Yes, we already had the dumped PHB diag-data when detecting frozen PE
during PCI probing. After PCI probing is completed, the EEH takes over
and we won't dump PHB diag-data during PCI config cycles.
Took a close look on what we have in the code. Those functions to dump
PHB (P7IOC & PHB3) needs a bit rework or refactoring since we're dumping
same PHB diag-data in pci.c and eeh-ioda.c at the same time.
Besides, I think the appropriate place to dump PHB diag-data (for EEH
core itself) would be ioda_eeh_get_log(), which is the indirect backend
of eeh_ops::get_log, instead of the function ioda_eeh_next_error().
Ben, please drop this one for now and I'll send the revised one :-)
Thanks,
Gavin
>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
>> index 02245ce..481528d 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
>> @@ -994,8 +994,11 @@ static int ioda_eeh_next_error(struct eeh_pe **pe)
>> if (ioda_eeh_get_pe(hose, frozen_pe_no, pe))
>> break;
>>
>> + /* It would be always indicative to have PHB diag-data */
>> pr_err("EEH: Frozen PE#%x on PHB#%x detected\n",
>> (*pe)->addr, (*pe)->phb->global_number);
>> + ioda_eeh_phb_diag(hose);
>> +
>> ret = 1;
>> goto out;
>> }
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-20 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-20 9:36 [PATCH] powerpc/eeh: Dump PHB3 diag-data on frozen PE Gavin Shan
2013-11-20 9:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-11-20 10:09 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='20131120100927.GA2546@shangw.(null)' \
--to=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).