From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: mikey@neuling.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
mingo@kernel.org, Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/10] perf: New conditional branch filter
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:18:17 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131206131817.GB2279@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386218874.6009.7.camel@concordia>
Em Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 03:47:54PM +1100, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 16:02 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > This patchset is the re-spin of the original branch stack sampling
> > patchset which introduced new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND branch filter. This patchset
> > also enables SW based branch filtering support for book3s powerpc platforms which
> > have PMU HW backed branch stack sampling support.
> >
> > Summary of code changes in this patchset:
> >
> > (1) Introduces a new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND branch filter
> > (2) Add the "cond" branch filter options in the "perf record" tool
> > (3) Enable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND in X86 platforms
> > (4) Enable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND in POWER8 platform
> > (5) Update the documentation regarding "perf record" tool
>
>
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> Can you please take just patches 1-5 into the perf tree? And do you mind
> putting them in a topic branch so Benh can merge that.
This is mostly kernel code, I process the userspace ones, so I think either
Ingo or PeterZ should pick these, Ingo, Peter?
Only:
Subject: [PATCH V4 03/10] perf, tool: Conditional branch filter 'cond' added to perf record
Which is a one liner, touches tools/perf/, and I'm ok with it.
- Arnaldo
> The remaining patches are powerpc specific and still need some more review.
>
> cheers
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-06 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-04 10:32 [PATCH V4 00/10] perf: New conditional branch filter Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 01/10] perf: Add PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 02/10] powerpc, perf: Enable conditional branch filter for POWER8 Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 03/10] perf, tool: Conditional branch filter 'cond' added to perf record Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 04/10] x86, perf: Add conditional branch filtering support Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-06 16:46 ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 05/10] perf, documentation: Description for conditional branch filter Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 06/10] powerpc, perf: Change the name of HW PMU branch filter tracking variable Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 07/10] powerpc, lib: Add new branch instruction analysis support functions Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09 6:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-10 6:09 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-20 10:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 08/10] powerpc, perf: Enable SW filtering in branch stack sampling framework Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09 6:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-10 5:57 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-12 8:45 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-13 2:47 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-20 11:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-24 3:29 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-24 3:50 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-24 4:35 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 09/10] power8, perf: Change BHRB branch filter configuration Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09 6:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-13 8:20 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-18 0:08 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-18 3:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-04 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 10/10] powerpc, perf: Cleanup SW branch filter list look up Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-09 6:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-12-20 11:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-05 4:47 ` [PATCH V4 00/10] perf: New conditional branch filter Michael Ellerman
2013-12-06 13:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2013-12-09 0:41 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131206131817.GB2279@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).