From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: michael@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "pseries/iommu: Remove DDW on kexec"
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:10:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140110231041.GB12343@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140110230938.GA12343@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
After reverting 25ebc45b93452d0bc60271f178237123c4b26808
("powerpc/pseries/iommu: remove default window before attempting DDW
manipulation"), we no longer remove the base window in enable_ddw.
Therefore, we no longer need to reset the DMA window state in
find_existing_ddw_windows(). We can instead go back to what was done
before, which simply reuses the previous configuration, if any. Further,
this removes the final caller of the reset-pe-dma-windows call, so
remove those functions.
This fixes an EEH on kdump with the ipr driver. The EEH occurs, because
the initcall removes the DDW configuration (64-bit DMA window), but
doesn't ensure the ops are via the IOMMU -- a DMA operation occurs
during probe (still investigating this) and we EEH.
This reverts commit 14b6f00f8a4fdec5ccd45a0710284de301a61628.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
index ed6e553..dc79e7c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
@@ -783,68 +783,33 @@ static u64 find_existing_ddw(struct device_node *pdn)
return dma_addr;
}
-static void __restore_default_window(struct eeh_dev *edev,
- u32 ddw_restore_token)
-{
- u32 cfg_addr;
- u64 buid;
- int ret;
-
- /*
- * Get the config address and phb buid of the PE window.
- * Rely on eeh to retrieve this for us.
- * Retrieve them from the pci device, not the node with the
- * dma-window property
- */
- cfg_addr = edev->config_addr;
- if (edev->pe_config_addr)
- cfg_addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
- buid = edev->phb->buid;
-
- do {
- ret = rtas_call(ddw_restore_token, 3, 1, NULL, cfg_addr,
- BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid));
- } while (rtas_busy_delay(ret));
- pr_info("ibm,reset-pe-dma-windows(%x) %x %x %x returned %d\n",
- ddw_restore_token, cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid), ret);
-}
-
static int find_existing_ddw_windows(void)
{
+ int len;
struct device_node *pdn;
+ struct direct_window *window;
const struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *direct64;
- const u32 *ddw_extensions;
if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR))
return 0;
for_each_node_with_property(pdn, DIRECT64_PROPNAME) {
- direct64 = of_get_property(pdn, DIRECT64_PROPNAME, NULL);
+ direct64 = of_get_property(pdn, DIRECT64_PROPNAME, &len);
if (!direct64)
continue;
- /*
- * We need to ensure the IOMMU table is active when we
- * return from the IOMMU setup so that the common code
- * can clear the table or find the holes. To that end,
- * first, remove any existing DDW configuration.
- */
- remove_ddw(pdn);
+ window = kzalloc(sizeof(*window), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!window || len < sizeof(struct dynamic_dma_window_prop)) {
+ kfree(window);
+ remove_ddw(pdn);
+ continue;
+ }
- /*
- * Second, if we are running on a new enough level of
- * firmware where the restore API is present, use it to
- * restore the 32-bit window, which was removed in
- * create_ddw.
- * If the API is not present, then create_ddw couldn't
- * have removed the 32-bit window in the first place, so
- * removing the DDW configuration should be sufficient.
- */
- ddw_extensions = of_get_property(pdn, "ibm,ddw-extensions",
- NULL);
- if (ddw_extensions && ddw_extensions[0] > 0)
- __restore_default_window(of_node_to_eeh_dev(pdn),
- ddw_extensions[1]);
+ window->device = pdn;
+ window->prop = direct64;
+ spin_lock(&direct_window_list_lock);
+ list_add(&window->list, &direct_window_list);
+ spin_unlock(&direct_window_list_lock);
}
return 0;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-10 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-10 23:09 [PATCH] Revert "powerpc/pseries/iommu: remove default window before attempting DDW manipulation" Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-01-10 23:10 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140110231041.GB12343@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).