linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: set the correct ksp_limit on ppc32 when switching to irq stack
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:14:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140121161450.GA3311@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389932728-25178-1-git-send-email-haokexin@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:25:28PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> Guenter Roeck has got the following call trace on a p2020 board:
>   Kernel stack overflow in process eb3e5a00, r1=eb79df90
>   CPU: 0 PID: 2838 Comm: ssh Not tainted 3.13.0-rc8-juniper-00146-g19eca00 #4
>   task: eb3e5a00 ti: c0616000 task.ti: ef440000
>   NIP: c003a420 LR: c003a410 CTR: c0017518
>   REGS: eb79dee0 TRAP: 0901   Not tainted (3.13.0-rc8-juniper-00146-g19eca00)
>   MSR: 00029000 <CE,EE,ME>  CR: 24008444  XER: 00000000
>   GPR00: c003a410 eb79df90 eb3e5a00 00000000 eb05d900 00000001 65d87646 00000000
>   GPR08: 00000000 020b8000 00000000 00000000 44008442
>   NIP [c003a420] __do_softirq+0x94/0x1ec
>   LR [c003a410] __do_softirq+0x84/0x1ec
>   Call Trace:
>   [eb79df90] [c003a410] __do_softirq+0x84/0x1ec (unreliable)
>   [eb79dfe0] [c003a970] irq_exit+0xbc/0xc8
>   [eb79dff0] [c000cc1c] call_do_irq+0x24/0x3c
>   [ef441f20] [c00046a8] do_IRQ+0x8c/0xf8
>   [ef441f40] [c000e7f4] ret_from_except+0x0/0x18
>   --- Exception: 501 at 0xfcda524
>       LR = 0x10024900
>   Instruction dump:
>   7c781b78 3b40000a 3a73b040 543c0024 3a800000 3b3913a0 7ef5bb78 48201bf9
>   5463103a 7d3b182e 7e89b92e 7c008146 <3ba00000> 7e7e9b78 48000014 57fff87f
>   Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel stack overflow
>   CPU: 0 PID: 2838 Comm: ssh Not tainted 3.13.0-rc8-juniper-00146-g19eca00 #4
>   Call Trace:
> 
> The reason is that we have used the wrong register to calculate the
> ksp_limit in commit cbc9565ee826 (powerpc: Remove ksp_limit on ppc64).
> Just fix it.
> 
> As suggested by Benjamin Herrenschmidt, also add the C prototype of the
> function in the comment in order to avoid such kind of errors in the
> future.
> 
Was this patch accepted, or are there any problems with it ?
I didn't see any comments, and it still isn't upstream nor in linux-next.

Thanks,
Guenter

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-21 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-17  4:25 [PATCH] powerpc: set the correct ksp_limit on ppc32 when switching to irq stack Kevin Hao
2014-01-21 16:14 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-01-21 21:48   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-12  5:51     ` Kevin Hao
2014-02-12  9:39       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140121161450.GA3311@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).