From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4978:20e::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 477AD2C00B7 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 20:25:12 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:24:38 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] X86: remove redundant cpuidle_idle_call() Message-ID: <20140130092438.GK11314@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1391017513-12995-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <1391017513-12995-6-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , Russell King , Linux-sh list , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Lezcano , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Preeti U Murthy , Paul Mundt , Olof Johansson , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev , Ingo Molnar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:14:40PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Looking into some cpuidle drivers for x86 I found at least one that > doesn't respect this convention. Damn. Which one? We should probably fix it :-)