From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81E422C0091 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 18:27:18 +1100 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e33.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 00:27:15 -0700 Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A64919D8042 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 00:27:13 -0700 (MST) Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s147QiNm55574640 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 08:26:49 +0100 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s147QqdX015997 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 00:26:52 -0700 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 23:26:30 -0800 From: Nishanth Aravamudan To: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory Message-ID: <20140204072630.GB10101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20140124232902.GB30361@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140125001643.GA25344@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140125011041.GB25344@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140127055805.GA2471@lge.com> <20140128182947.GA1591@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140203230026.GA15383@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: Han Pingtian , mpm@selenic.com, penberg@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paulus@samba.org, Anton Blanchard , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wanpeng Li List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 03.02.2014 [21:38:36 -0600], Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > So what's the status of this patch? Christoph, do you think this is fine > > as it is? > > Certainly enabling CONFIG_MEMORYLESS_NODES is the right thing to do and I > already acked the patch. Yes, sorry for my lack of clarity. I meant Joonsoo's latest patch for the $SUBJECT issue. Thanks, Nish