From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A0A52C0082 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 04:08:51 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:08:45 +0100 From: Torsten Duwe To: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert powerpc simple spinlocks into ticket locks Message-ID: <20140207170845.GD2107@lst.de> References: <20140206103736.GA18054@lst.de> <20140206163837.GT2936@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140206173727.GA13048@lst.de> <1391717992.6733.232.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <20140207090248.GB26811@lst.de> <20140207103139.GP5002@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140207104530.GG5126@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140207114949.GA2107@lst.de> <20140207122837.GA3104@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140207151847.GB3104@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140207151847.GB3104@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Cc: Tom Musta , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard , Scott Wood , "Paul E. McKenney" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:18:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:28:37PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Anyway, you can do a version with lwarx/stwcx if you're looking get rid > > of lharx. > > the below seems to compile into relatively ok asm. It can be done better > if you write the entire thing by hand though. [...] > > static inline unsigned int xadd(unsigned int *v, unsigned int i) > { > int t, ret; > > __asm__ __volatile__ ( > "1: lwarx %0, 0, %4\n" > " mr %1, %0\n" > " add %0, %3, %0\n" > " stwcx. %0, %0, %4\n" > " bne- 1b\n" > : "=&r" (t), "=&r" (ret), "+m" (*v) > : "r" (i), "r" (v) > : "cc"); > > return ret; > } > I don't like this xadd thing -- it's so x86 ;) x86 has its LOCK prefix, ppc has ll/sc. That should be reflected somehow IMHO. Maybe if xadd became mandatory for some kernel library. > > void ticket_unlock(tickets_t *lock) > { > ticket_t tail = lock->tail + 1; > > /* > * The store is save against the xadd for it will make the ll/sc fail > * and try again. Aside from that PowerISA guarantees single-copy > * atomicy for half-word writes. > * > * And since only the lock owner will ever write the tail, we're good. > */ > smp_store_release(&lock->tail, tail); > } Yeah, let's try that on top of v2 (just posted). First, I want to see v2 work as nicely as v1 -- compiling a debug kernel takes a while... Torsten