From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: enable CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:41:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140213214131.GB12409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140128183457.GA9315@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 28.01.2014 [10:34:57 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Anton Blanchard found an issue with an LPAR that had no memory in Node
> 0. Christoph Lameter recommended, as one possible solution, to use
> numa_mem_id() for locality of the nearest memory node-wise. However,
> numa_mem_id() [and the other related APIs] are only useful if
> CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is set. This is only the case for ia64
> currently, but clearly we can have memoryless nodes on ppc64. Add the
> Kconfig option and define it to be the same value as CONFIG_NUMA.
>
> On the LPAR in question, which was very inefficiently using slabs, this
> took the slab consumption at boot from roughly 7GB to roughly 4GB.
Err, this should have been
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
!
Sorry about that Ben!
> ---
> Ben, the only question I have wrt this change is if it's appropriate to
> change it for all powerpc configs (that have NUMA on)?
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 25493a0..bb2d5fe 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -447,6 +447,9 @@ config NODES_SHIFT
> default "4"
> depends on NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
>
> +config HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
> + def_bool NUMA
> +
> config ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
> def_bool y
> depends on PPC64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-13 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-28 18:34 [PATCH] powerpc: enable CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-01-29 15:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-02-13 21:41 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2014-02-13 22:45 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-14 0:11 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140213214131.GB12409@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).