From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C4B2C0096 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 07:13:55 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:15:15 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Cody P Schafer Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] sysfs: create bin_attributes under the requested group Message-ID: <20140215201515.GA28316@kroah.com> References: <1392415338-16288-1-git-send-email-cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1392415338-16288-4-git-send-email-cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1392415338-16288-4-git-send-email-cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Michael Ellerman , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linux PPC List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 02:02:07PM -0800, Cody P Schafer wrote: > bin_attributes created/updated in create_files() (such as those listed > via (struct device).attribute_groups) were not placed under the > specified group, and instead appeared in the base kobj directory. > > Fix this by making bin_attributes use creating code similar to normal > attributes. > > A quick grep shows that no one is using bin_attrs in a named attribute > group yet, so we can do this without breaking anything in usespace. > > Note that I do not add is_visible() support to > bin_attributes, though that could be done as well. is_visible() support would be nice to add if you get a chance. thanks, greg k-h