From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Received: from LGEMRELSE1Q.lge.com (LGEMRELSE1Q.lge.com [156.147.1.111])
 by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8BA2C00D1
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:00:50 +1100 (EST)
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:00:51 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for
 determining the fallback node
Message-ID: <20140217070051.GE3468@lge.com>
References: <1391674026-20092-2-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402060041040.21148@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
 <CAAmzW4PXkdpNi5pZ=4BzdXNvqTEAhcuw-x0pWidqrxzdePxXxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402061248450.9567@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
 <20140207054819.GC28952@lge.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402071150090.15168@nuc>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402071245040.20246@nuc>
 <20140210191321.GD1558@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20140211074159.GB27870@lge.com>
 <20140213065137.GA10860@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20140213065137.GA10860@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Han Pingtian <hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
 Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
 Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:51:37PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Hi Joonsoo,
> Also, given that only ia64 and (hopefuly soon) ppc64 can set
> CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES, does that mean x86_64 can't have
> memoryless nodes present? Even with fakenuma? Just curious.

I don't know, because I'm not expert on NUMA system :)
At first glance, fakenuma can't be used for testing
CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES. Maybe some modification is needed.

Thanks.