From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33EF22C00CC for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:34:20 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:34:07 +0800 From: Chenhui Zhao To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] powerpc/85xx: support CPU hotplug for e500mc and e5500 Message-ID: <20140312043407.GC4706@localhost.localdomain> References: <1394168285-32275-1-git-send-email-chenhui.zhao@freescale.com> <1394168285-32275-4-git-send-email-chenhui.zhao@freescale.com> <1394581693.13761.66.camel@snotra.buserror.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <1394581693.13761.66.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason.Jin@freescale.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 06:48:13PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 12:58 +0800, Chenhui Zhao wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c > > index ac2621a..f3f4401 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c > > @@ -405,8 +405,12 @@ void generic_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) > > > > for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) { > > smp_rmb(); > > - if (per_cpu(cpu_state, cpu) == CPU_DEAD) > > + if (per_cpu(cpu_state, cpu) == CPU_DEAD) { > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 > > + paca[cpu].cpu_start = 0; > > +#endif > > Why wasn't this needed by previous ppc64 machines? If not clear, cpu can't start in the case of cpu hotpolug. The function pseries_cpu_die() in arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c also clears the flag. > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/smp.c > > index 2e5911e..0047883 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/smp.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/smp.c > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > > > #include > > #include > > @@ -46,6 +47,17 @@ static u64 timebase; > > static int tb_req; > > static int tb_valid; > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_E500MC > > +/* specify the cpu PM state when cpu dies, PH15/NAP is the default */ > > +int qoriq_cpu_die_state = E500_PM_PH15; > > +#endif > > static? Is there any way to modify this other than modifying source > code? > > BTW, QorIQ doesn't imply an e500mc derivative. Will support e500, but for now these code support e500mc derivative in advance. Supposed qoriq_cpu_die_state can be changed by platform init code if the default value is not proper for a specific platform. > > > @@ -125,6 +138,34 @@ static void mpc85xx_take_timebase(void) > > } > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_E500MC > > +static void qoriq_cpu_die(void) > > +{ > > + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); > > + > > + local_irq_disable(); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 > > + __hard_irq_disable(); > > +#endif > > Why this instead of one call to hard_irq_disable() (no leading > underscores)? > > -Scott hard_irq_disable() will clear soft_enabled again. local_irq_disable() has cleared it. Will use hard_irq_disable() to replace these lines. local_irq_disable(); #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 __hard_irq_disable(); #endif -Chenhui