From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com (e39.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F3CB2C018A for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 03:50:11 +1100 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e39.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:50:09 -0600 Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.28]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F85C90041 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:50:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s2DGo8JM6816226 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:50:08 GMT Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s2DGo72E030720 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:50:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:49:50 -0700 From: Nishanth Aravamudan To: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: Node 0 not necessary for powerpc? Message-ID: <20140313164949.GC22247@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20140311195632.GA946@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, anton@samba.org, rientjes@google.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 12.03.2014 [08:41:40 -0500], Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > I have a P7 system that has no node0, but a node0 shows up in numactl > > --hardware, which has no cpus and no memory (and no PCI devices): > > Well as you see from the code there has been so far the assumption that > node 0 has memory. I have never run a machine that has no node 0 memory. Do you mean beyond the initialization? I didn't see anything obvious so far in the code itself that assumes a given node has memory (in the sense of the nid). What are your thoughts about how best to support this? Thanks, Nish