From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co9ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.163.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F09882C00CB for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:37:16 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:37:08 +0800 From: Chenhui Zhao To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] powerpc/85xx: disable irq by hardware when suspend for 64-bit Message-ID: <20140317093708.GA6204@localhost.localdomain> References: <1394168285-32275-1-git-send-email-chenhui.zhao@freescale.com> <1394168285-32275-5-git-send-email-chenhui.zhao@freescale.com> <1394581880.13761.69.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <20140312074610.GD4706@localhost.localdomain> <1394836901.12479.125.camel@snotra.buserror.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <1394836901.12479.125.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason.Jin@freescale.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:41:41PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 15:46 +0800, Chenhui Zhao wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 06:51:20PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 12:58 +0800, Chenhui Zhao wrote: > > > > In 64-bit mode, kernel just clears the irq soft-enable flag > > > > in struct paca_struct to disable external irqs. But, in > > > > the case of suspend, irqs should be disabled by hardware. > > > > Therefore, hook a function to ppc_md.suspend_disable_irqs > > > > to really disable irqs. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chenhui Zhao > > > > --- > > > > arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c > > > > index 3fdf9f3..983d81f 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c > > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c > > > > @@ -32,6 +32,13 @@ > > > > #include > > > > #include "smp.h" > > > > > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC64) && defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND) > > > > +static void fsl_suspend_disable_irqs(void) > > > > +{ > > > > + __hard_irq_disable(); > > > > +} > > > > +#endif > > > > > > Why the underscore version? Don't you want PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS to be set? > > > > > > If hard disabling is appropriate here, shouldn't we do it in > > > generic_suspend_disable_irqs()? > > > > > > Are there any existing platforms that supply a > > > ppc_md.suspend_disable_irqs()? I don't see any when grepping. > > > > > > -Scott > > > > Will use hard_irq_disable(). > > > > I think this is a general problem for powerpc. > > Should clear MSR_EE before suspend. I agree to put it > > in generic_suspend_disable_irqs(). > > BTW, make sure you test this patchset with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT and > similar debugging options to help ensure that the soft IRQ state is > being tracked properly. > > -Scott OK. I'll keep that in mind. -Chenhui