From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com (e39.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34F322C00B0 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:20:05 +1100 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e39.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 02:20:03 -0600 Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.23]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7ADC9003E for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 04:19:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s2L8JwMp8716692 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:19:58 GMT Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s2L8JwNA008579 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 04:19:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:49:42 +0530 From: Gautham R Shenoy To: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] powernv: Enable Dynamic Frequency Message-ID: <20140321081942.GE27293@in.ibm.com> References: <1395317460-14811-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: "Gautham R. Shenoy" , Linux PM list , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Viresh, On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 01:16:03PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Gautham R. Shenoy > wrote: > > This is the v3 of the consolidated patchset consisting > > patches for enabling cpufreq on IBM POWERNV platforms > > along with some enhancements. > > This is the first time I saw them. Looks like you never Cc'd linux-pm list. > Also, would be better to keep Maintainers in --to field so that they can > review them as soon as possible. Otherwise they might stay on lists for > a long time.. Yes, I hadn't Cc'ed linux-pm list last time around. Sorry about that. Will keep this in mind the next time around. Also, your suggestion regarding keeping the Maintainers in --to field is well taken. -- Thanks and Regards gautham. >