From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 1wt.eu (1wt.eu [62.212.114.60]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7A01400B4 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 21:01:35 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:01:28 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: zhuyj Subject: Re: on kernel 2.6.34.15, vlan and raw packets can not be received with gfar-enet nic Message-ID: <20140403100128.GE16158@1wt.eu> References: <53310F4E.4080104@gmail.com> <533D25D4.4000607@gmail.com> <20140403092727.GD16158@1wt.eu> <533D30A1.1060509@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <533D30A1.1060509@gmail.com> Cc: "Yang, Zhangle \(Eric\)" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, richardcochran@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, guang.yang@windriver.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn, sandeep.kumar@freescale.com, Claudiu Manoil , "Tao, Yue" , joe@perches.com, festevam@gmail.com, clarocq@gmail.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Zhu, On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 05:57:53PM +0800, zhuyj wrote: > I reference the following 2 mainline commits. These 2 commits are based > on the current kernel 3.x and ethtool. > If we only backport these 2 commits on kernel 2.6.x, this problem will > not be fixed yet. OK fine, I just wanted that we keep the reference of these equivalent patches in the commit message so that if later a newer patch changes anything they did, at least we have some indications that the commit might also have to be revisited. I'll merge your patch and put these references there. Thanks, Willy