From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EE69140099 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 21:30:26 +1000 (EST) From: Marek Vasut To: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] defconfigs: add MTD_SPI_NOR (dependency for M25P80) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:07:44 +0200 References: <1397719309-2022-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1397719309-2022-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <201404171307.44214.marex@denx.de> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Russell King , Stephen Warren , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Steven Miao , Linux Kernel , Ralf Baechle , adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Thierry Reding , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sascha Hauer , Olof Johansson , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Shawn Guo List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday, April 17, 2014 at 09:21:44 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > Hi all, > > We are introducing a new SPI-NOR library/framework for MTD, to support > various types of SPI-NOR flash controllers which require (or benefit from) > intimate knowledge of the flash interface, rather than just the relatively > dumb SPI interface. This library borrows much of the m25p80 driver for its > abstraction and moves this code into a spi-nor module. > > This means CONFIG_M25P80 now has a dependency on CONFIG_MTD_SPI_NOR, which > should be added to the defconfigs. I'm not sure what is the best process > for doing this. Should each $ARCH maintainer just take their respective > patch, even if the MTD_SPI_NOR Kconfig symbol is not defined for them yet? > Or should maintainers plan on merging the relevant SPI-NOR code into their > trees during the development cycle? Or some third option? Shouldn't the M25P80 driver just "select" the SPI NOR framework? Then you won't need the adjustment to defconfigs at all I think. Best regards, Marek Vasut