From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063FA140133 for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 03:01:32 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 22:18:26 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: hongbo.zhang@freescale.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] DMA: Freescale: remove the unnecessary FSL_DMA_LD_DEBUG Message-ID: <20140502164826.GC32284@intel.com> References: <1397809071-5353-1-git-send-email-hongbo.zhang@freescale.com> <1397809071-5353-2-git-send-email-hongbo.zhang@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1397809071-5353-2-git-send-email-hongbo.zhang@freescale.com> Cc: leo.li@freescale.com, vkoul@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, scottwood@freescale.com, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 04:17:44PM +0800, hongbo.zhang@freescale.com wrote: > From: Hongbo Zhang > > Some codes are calling chan_dbg with FSL_DMA_LD_DEBUG surrounded, it is really > unnecessary to use such a macro because chan_dbg is a wrapper of dev_dbg, we do > have corresponding DEBUG macro to switch on/off dev_dbg, and most of the other > codes are also calling chan_dbg directly without using FSL_DMA_LD_DEBUG. > Applied, thanks -- ~Vinod