From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D0231400A6 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 08:08:50 +1000 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e32.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 9 May 2014 16:08:48 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by d03dlp02.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933483E4003E for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 16:08:46 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (d03av06.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.245]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s49M7geS262520 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 00:07:42 +0200 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s49MCbxD027227 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 16:12:37 -0600 Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 15:08:45 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Gabriel Paubert Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: irq work racing with timer interrupt can result in timer interrupt hang Message-ID: <20140509220845.GY8754@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20140509174712.55fe72d0@kryten> <20140509134113.GP8754@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140509215005.GA28239@visitor2.iram.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140509215005.GA28239@visitor2.iram.es> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, Anton Blanchard Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 11:50:05PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:41:13AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:47:12PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > > I am seeing an issue where a CPU running perf eventually hangs. > > > Traces show timer interrupts happening every 4 seconds even > > > when a userspace task is running on the CPU. > > > > Is this by chance every 4.2 seconds? The reason I ask is that > > Paul Clarke and I are seeing an interrupt every 4.2 seconds when > > he runs NO_HZ_FULL, and are trying to get rid of it. ;-) > > Hmmm, it's close to 2^32 nanoseconds, isnt't it suspiscious? Now that you mention it... ;-) So you are telling me that we are not succeeding in completely turning off the decrementer interrupt? Thanx, Paul