From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lgeamrelo01.lge.com (lgeamrelo01.lge.com [156.147.1.125]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B5C1A00A5 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 12:54:16 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 11:41:40 +0900 From: Joonsoo Kim To: Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() Message-ID: <20140519024140.GD19615@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> References: <20140206020757.GC5433@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1391674026-20092-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <20140516233735.GH8941@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140516233735.GH8941@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Han Pingtian , mpm@selenic.com, penberg@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paulus@samba.org, Anton Blanchard , David Rientjes , Christoph Lameter , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wanpeng Li List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 04:37:35PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 06.02.2014 [17:07:04 +0900], Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > Currently, if allocation constraint to node is NUMA_NO_NODE, we search > > a partial slab on numa_node_id() node. This doesn't work properly on the > > system having memoryless node, since it can have no memory on that node and > > there must be no partial slab on that node. > > > > On that node, page allocation always fallback to numa_mem_id() first. So > > searching a partial slab on numa_node_id() in that case is proper solution > > for memoryless node case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim > > Acked-by: Nishanth Aravamudan > > Joonsoo, would you send this one on to Andrew? Hello, Okay. I will do it. Thanks.