From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B4F1A0041 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:23:45 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:23:36 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Preeti U Murthy Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] powerpc, powernv, CPU hotplug: Put offline CPUs in Fast-Sleep instead of Nap Message-ID: <20140605042336.GA3199@drongo> References: <20140528043703.15676.58580.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.com> <20140528043856.15676.35844.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140528043856.15676.35844.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.com> Cc: svaidyan@in.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:08:56AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote: > From: Srivatsa S. Bhat > > The offline cpus are put to fast sleep if the idle state is discovered in the > device tree. This is to gain maximum powersavings in the offline state. ... > while (!generic_check_cpu_restart(cpu)) { > ppc64_runlatch_off(); > - power7_nap(); > + > + /* If sleep is supported, go to sleep, instead of nap */ > + if (idle_states & IDLE_USE_SLEEP) > + power7_sleep(); > + else > + power7_nap(); > + > ppc64_runlatch_on(); > if (!generic_check_cpu_restart(cpu)) { > DBG("CPU%d Unexpected exit while offline !\n", cpu); What is the latency for waking up from fast sleep state? I'm concerned this will increase the latency for entering KVM guests. Paul.