From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: benh@au1.ibm.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com, yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, qiudayu@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 11/17] ppc/pnv: Expand VF resources according to the number of total_pe
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:07:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140623060707.GA12055@shangw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402365399-5121-12-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:56:33AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>On PHB3, VF resources will be covered by M64 BAR to have better PE isolation.
>Mostly the total_pe number is different from the total_VFs, which will lead to
>a conflict between MMIO space and the PE number.
>
>This patch expands the VF resource size to reserve total_pe number of VFs'
>resource, which prevents the conflict.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h | 6 +++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 3 ++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 15 ++++++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 107 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h
>index ad3025d..2f2e770 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h
>@@ -234,9 +234,15 @@ struct machdep_calls {
>
> /* Called after scan and before resource survey */
> void (*pcibios_fixup_phb)(struct pci_controller *hose);
>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>+ void (*pcibios_fixup_sriov)(struct pci_bus *bus);
>+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>
> /* Called during PCI resource reassignment */
> resource_size_t (*pcibios_window_alignment)(struct pci_bus *, unsigned long type);
>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>+ resource_size_t (*__pci_sriov_resource_size)(struct pci_dev *, int resno);
resource_size_t (*pcibios_sriov_resource_size)(struct pci_dev *, int resno);
You probably can put all SRIOV related functions together:
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
func_a;
func_b;
:
#endif
>+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>
> /* Called to shutdown machine specific hardware not already controlled
> * by other drivers.
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>index 4ca90a3..8c849d8 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>@@ -168,6 +168,9 @@ struct pci_dn {
> #define IODA_INVALID_PE (-1)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV
> int pe_number;
>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>+ u16 vfs;
>+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
> #endif
> };
>
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>index c449a26..c4e2e92 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>@@ -120,6 +120,16 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_window_alignment(struct pci_bus *bus,
> return 1;
> }
>
>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>+resource_size_t pcibios_sriov_resource_size(struct pci_dev *pdev, int resno)
>+{
>+ if (ppc_md.__pci_sriov_resource_size)
>+ return ppc_md.__pci_sriov_resource_size(pdev, resno);
>+
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>+
> static resource_size_t pcibios_io_size(const struct pci_controller *hose)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>@@ -1675,6 +1685,11 @@ void pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller *hose)
> if (ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_phb)
> ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_phb(hose);
>
>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>+ if (ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov)
>+ ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov(bus);
One question I probably asked before: why we can't put the logic
of ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov() to ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_phb()?
>+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>+
> /* Configure PCI Express settings */
> if (bus && !pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
> struct pci_bus *child;
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>index 87cb3089..7dfad6a 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>@@ -1298,6 +1298,67 @@ static void pnv_pci_init_ioda_msis(struct pnv_phb *phb)
> static void pnv_pci_init_ioda_msis(struct pnv_phb *phb) { }
> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI */
>
>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>+static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>+{
>+ struct pci_controller *hose;
>+ struct pnv_phb *phb;
>+ struct resource *res;
>+ int i;
>+ resource_size_t size;
>+ struct pci_dn *pdn;
>+
>+ if (!pdev->is_physfn || pdev->is_added)
>+ return;
>+
>+ hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
>+ if (!hose) {
>+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: NULL pci_controller\n", __func__);
>+ return;
>+ }
>+
>+ phb = hose->private_data;
>+ if (!phb) {
>+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: NULL PHB\n", __func__);
>+ return;
>+ }
>+
>+ pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>+ pdn->vfs = 0;
>+
>+ for (i = PCI_IOV_RESOURCES; i <= PCI_IOV_RESOURCE_END; i++) {
>+ res = &pdev->resource[i];
>+ if (!res->flags || res->parent)
>+ continue;
>+
>+ if (!is_mem_pref_64_type(res->flags))
>+ continue;
>+
>+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PowerNV: Fixing VF BAR[%d] %pR to\n",
>+ i, res);
>+ size = pci_sriov_resource_size(pdev, i);
>+ res->end = res->start + size * phb->ioda.total_pe - 1;
>+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, " %pR\n", res);
>+ }
>+ pdn->vfs = phb->ioda.total_pe;
>+}
>+
>+static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_sriov(struct pci_bus *bus)
>+{
>+ struct pci_dev *pdev;
>+ struct pci_bus *b;
>+
>+ list_for_each_entry(pdev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
>+ b = pdev->subordinate;
>+
>+ if (b)
>+ pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_sriov(b);
>+
>+ pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(pdev);
>+ }
>+}
>+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>+
> /*
> * This function is supposed to be called on basis of PE from top
> * to bottom style. So the the I/O or MMIO segment assigned to
>@@ -1498,6 +1559,22 @@ static resource_size_t pnv_pci_window_alignment(struct pci_bus *bus,
> return phb->ioda.io_segsize;
> }
>
>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>+static resource_size_t __pnv_pci_sriov_resource_size(struct pci_dev *pdev, int resno)
>+{
>+ struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>+ u64 size = 0;
>+
>+ if (!pdn->vfs)
>+ return size;
>+
>+ size = resource_size(pdev->resource + resno);
>+ do_div(size, pdn->vfs);
>+
>+ return size;
>+}
>+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>+
> /* Prevent enabling devices for which we couldn't properly
> * assign a PE
> */
>@@ -1692,9 +1769,15 @@ void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct device_node *np,
> * for the P2P bridge bars so that each PCI bus (excluding
> * the child P2P bridges) can form individual PE.
> */
>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>+ ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov = pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_sriov;
>+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
> ppc_md.pcibios_fixup = pnv_pci_ioda_fixup;
> ppc_md.pcibios_enable_device_hook = pnv_pci_enable_device_hook;
> ppc_md.pcibios_window_alignment = pnv_pci_window_alignment;
>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>+ ppc_md.__pci_sriov_resource_size = __pnv_pci_sriov_resource_size;
>+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
> pci_add_flags(PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_RSRC);
>
> /* Reset IODA tables to a clean state */
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-23 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-10 1:56 [RFC PATCH V3 00/17] Enable SRIOV on POWER8 Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 01/17] pci/iov: Export interface for retrieve VF's BDF Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 02/17] pci/of: Match PCI VFs to dev-tree nodes dynamically Wei Yang
2014-06-23 5:07 ` Gavin Shan
2014-06-23 6:29 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 03/17] ppc/pci: don't unset pci resources for VFs Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 04/17] PCI: SRIOV: add VF enable/disable hook Wei Yang
2014-06-23 5:03 ` Gavin Shan
2014-06-23 6:29 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 05/17] ppc/pnv: user macro to define the TCE size Wei Yang
2014-06-23 5:12 ` Gavin Shan
2014-06-23 6:31 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 06/17] ppc/pnv: allocate pe->iommu_table dynamically Wei Yang
2014-06-24 10:06 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-06-25 1:12 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-25 4:12 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-06-25 5:27 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-25 7:50 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-06-25 7:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-06-25 9:18 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-25 9:13 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-25 9:20 ` David Laight
2014-06-25 9:31 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-25 10:30 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-07-14 3:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 07/17] ppc/pnv: Add function to deconfig a PE Wei Yang
2014-06-23 5:27 ` Gavin Shan
2014-06-23 9:07 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 08/17] PCI: Add weak pcibios_sriov_resource_size() interface Wei Yang
2014-06-23 5:41 ` Gavin Shan
2014-06-23 7:56 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 09/17] PCI: Add weak pcibios_sriov_resource_alignment() interface Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 10/17] PCI: take additional IOV BAR alignment in sizing and assigning Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 11/17] ppc/pnv: Expand VF resources according to the number of total_pe Wei Yang
2014-06-23 6:07 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2014-06-23 6:56 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-23 7:08 ` Gavin Shan
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 12/17] powerpc/powernv: implement pcibios_sriov_resource_alignment on powernv Wei Yang
2014-06-23 6:09 ` Gavin Shan
2014-06-23 8:21 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-23 23:29 ` Gavin Shan
2014-06-24 1:24 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 13/17] powerpc/powernv: shift VF resource with an offset Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 14/17] ppc/pci: create/release dev-tree node for VFs Wei Yang
2014-06-18 18:26 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-18 20:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-06-19 2:46 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-19 8:30 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-19 9:42 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-20 3:46 ` Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 15/17] powerpc/powernv: allocate VF PE Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 16/17] ppc/pci: Expanding IOV BAR, with m64_per_iov supported Wei Yang
2014-06-10 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH V3 17/17] ppc/pnv: Group VF PE when IOV BAR is big on PHB3 Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140623060707.GA12055@shangw \
--to=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=qiudayu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).