From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC 1/2] workqueue: use the nearest NUMA node, not the local one
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:09:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140717230958.GB32660@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140717230923.GA32660@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In the presence of memoryless nodes, the workqueue code incorrectly uses
cpu_to_node() to determine what node to prefer memory allocations come
from. cpu_to_mem() should be used instead, which will use the nearest
NUMA node with memory.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 35974ac..0bba022 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3547,7 +3547,12 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
for_each_node(node) {
if (cpumask_subset(pool->attrs->cpumask,
wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node])) {
- pool->node = node;
+ /*
+ * We could use local_memory_node(node) here,
+ * but it is expensive and the following caches
+ * the same value.
+ */
+ pool->node = cpu_to_mem(cpumask_first(pool->attrs->cpumask));
break;
}
}
@@ -4921,7 +4926,7 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
pool->cpu = cpu;
cpumask_copy(pool->attrs->cpumask, cpumask_of(cpu));
pool->attrs->nice = std_nice[i++];
- pool->node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
+ pool->node = cpu_to_mem(cpu);
/* alloc pool ID */
mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-17 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 23:09 [RFC 0/2] Memoryless nodes and kworker Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-07-17 23:09 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2014-07-17 23:15 ` [RFC 2/2] powerpc: reorder per-cpu NUMA information's initialization Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-07-18 8:11 ` [RFC 1/2] workqueue: use the nearest NUMA node, not the local one Lai Jiangshan
2014-07-18 17:33 ` Nish Aravamudan
2014-07-18 11:20 ` [RFC 0/2] Memoryless nodes and kworker Tejun Heo
2014-07-18 17:42 ` Nish Aravamudan
2014-07-18 18:00 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-18 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-18 18:12 ` Nish Aravamudan
2014-07-18 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-18 18:47 ` Nish Aravamudan
2014-07-18 18:58 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140717230958.GB32660@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).